Page 1 of 2
All Forums
Re:5yrs for breach (by Hoping2)
Just heard that a man gets 5 yrs jail term for a breach of a T.R.O. Wife texts him and tells him that her boyfriend had just held his child over the balcony by the legs. Father shows up to find out what the story is, so wife calls the police and tells them he just turned up at her place she was in fear of her life stating that she had a T.R.O on him for one month. Police arrest him and charge him with breaching the order. Goes to court the next day judge sentences him to 5 with non parole peroid of 2 years. When he tells judge that the wife had sent him a txt about his child being hang over the balcony judge responds An accident waiting to happen.
@Hoping2: I think it is ODD, that when he gets this alleged tex (is there proof of the tex?) . That instead of calling the police (which would save time & possibly his child's life!)... Or texing/calling the mother of the child to call the police ... That he goes over there ?! So what if there was an (alleged) tex. Something is very wrong here . Im not buying his story he's incrediably oblivious or lying. Yep... 5 yrs.
Last edited by Zilya777; 21-Feb-14 12:06 pm.
@Zilya777: yes he did have the txt as far as calling the police said he did but wife denied it when they had arrived
@Hoping2: I don't think he should of went over there. It was foolish. They are not a couple, he was not invited. And she had the "restraining order" (as we call it here), for a reason. Obviously, he thinks he has rights, that he does not have.
@Zilya777: he only went there because she had sent him a txt about what her boyfriend had allegally done. When he arrived she phoned the police and told them a whole heap of lies which police found out later. She had sent him the txt as she knew that he would be there for his child. But because of the T.R O they had to charge him for the breach. She told the judge that he sent threating txts to her when asked to present it the answer was deleted them from phone, a bit harsh i.m.o. 2 yrs for a women who is oblivously unstable
Hes a dumb ass for letting himself get set up like that.......and for breaking a restraining order....he clda called the police to check on his son....maybe jail will wisen him up.
@Hoping2: He is not doing 2yrs because his "wife"is unstable. He is doing time because he defied a court order by a judge. And she is not "his wife", she would be his "estranged wife " or "ex wife". And the only reason the judge asked for her texes, was to file, MORE charges against him, like "death threats". And the "accident waiting to happen" is this guy or the estranged wife, ending up dead. No matter what trouble they had w/eachother the judge did the right thing. The judge could have... Ordered that her phone company produce the texts in court. Then he might have to serve more time. And the estranged wife, still has time to file addictional charges. It would be a seperate case.
@WalkSoftly: he thought he child was in danger of being hurt bya person that had no right to hang a child over the balcony by his ankles. Micheal jackson done it and he got crucified by the public because he is a celebrity he should be allowed to no one should be able to do hang a child over the balcony by the ankles.
@Zilya777: doesn't matter if they are or not he only wanted to find out why the boyfriend had done it,after all it is his child. Any normal person would do the same thing.
@Hoping2: The (alledged) child abuse & endangerment... Again, a seperate case. Neither worrying for his child or the tex "justify" the biological father breaking the law, by violating the" courts mandate ", for him to stay away from his estranged wife.
Quick reply:
RULES:
- Be respectful at all times.
- Be mature and act like an adult.
- Respect different points of view.
- Discuss ideas, not specific users.
- Don't get personal.
- No profanity.
- No drama.
- No thread hijacking.
- No trolling.
- No spamming.
- No soliciting.
- No duplicate posting.
- No posting in the wrong section.
- No posting of contact information.
- Be welcoming to new users.
Login: