I see your point! The AK is very hard to beat in an urban enviro.

M-107 - a1.

a rifle i realy enjoy technicly not assault rifle is the M1 garand i own Two the absolutley amazing

2 rifles I have yet to get my hands on to shoot are FN's SCAR and FS2000. Has anyone here had any experience with either of these 2 guns??

Count me in on the Kalashnikov crowd. A battle rifle isn't about distance. It's about heavy lead in the air. Sure, the .556 can reach out to a thousand yards. Under perfect conditions. Conditions, though, are rarely perfect. I want a weapon that is time tested, reasonably accurate and above all functional.

Count me in on the Kalashnikov crowd. A battle rifle isn't about distance. It's about heavy lead in the air. Sure, the .556 can reach out to a thousand yards. Under perfect conditions. Conditions, though, are rarely perfect. I want a weapon that is time tested, reasonably accurate and above all functional.

If you're talking solely abt "lead in the air", an AK has a cyclic rate of fire of 600 rounds a minute and an M-16 has a rate of [Warning: Posting of Contact Info is not allowed. Please follow the rules.] rounds per minute...so the M-16 actually puts more "lead in the air". Of course, the AK fires the larger 7.62x39mm round and in theory should have greater "knockdown" power....One of the lesser known reasons that the U.S. decided to go with the M-16 and its smaller cartridge is, 1st of all, the increased rate of fire and the ability of an individual to carry more rounds on his person...and second reason has to do with the Hague Convention and its outlawing of any type of mushrooming or fragmenting small arms ammunition. The slower, tho heavier fmj 7.62 AK round tends to go straight thru, rarely disforming, and leaving a uniform wound channel...the high velocity, lightweight 5.56 M-16 round, on the other hand, tends to yaw upon entry and in effect, "mushrooms"...it also has the capacity to fragment easier, creating even more damage. People now assume that the AK is more reliable than an M-16 (AR in civilian life) and that is true when comparing them with a Direct Impingement gas system...But an AR with a piston driven system is just as reliable as an AK. That being said, the only people using AKs are undisciplined militia who are not smart enough to properly and regularly clean a weapon, and frikn gangstas....I, for 1, would never carry a "commie" weapon lol

And an M-16s cyclic rate is seven hundred fifty-nine hundred rounds per min...damn u andres and your "contact info" system! JUS KIDN lol

i not huge AK freak the only 2 commie rifles i enjoy alot are the original SKS and the M44 Mosnin Nagant great rifles they are and i have fired the SCAR and the FN2000 one Millitary the SCAR and one civilian The 2000 the SCAR is a great weapon but i prefer the M4 myself and the 2000 matter of prefrence i dnt care much for bulpups but it decent rifle and looks like it should be in luke skywalkers hands

@vinnie612: Its just hard not to own an AR or 2. There's SO much after market stuff for em these days...hell, I think u cud hang a Christmas tree off of one, if u want to lol...I really don't have much against AKs, except that they aren't accurate...and I HATE in-accurate weapons with a passion. Why fire 5 rounds and miss, when u can fire 5, and score 5 hits