""" PIV is always rape, ok?
Just to recall a basic fact: Intercourse/PIV is
always rape, plain and simple.
This is a developed recap from what I’ve been
saying in various comments here and there in
the last two years or so. as a radfem I’ve
always said PIV is rape and I remember being
disappointed to discover that so few radical
feminists stated it clearly. How can you
possibly see it otherwise? Intercourse is the
very means through which men oppress us,
from which we are not allowed to escape, yet
some instances of or PIV and intercourse may
be chosen and free? That makes no sense at
all.
First, well intercourse is NEVER sex for
women. Only men experience rape as sexual
and define it as such. Sex for men is the
unilateral penetration of their penis into a
woman (or anything else replacing and
symbolising the female orifice) whether she
thinks she wants it or not – which is the
definition of rape: that he will to do it anyway
and that he uses her and treats her as a
receptacle, in all circumstances – it makes no
difference to him experiencing it as sexual.
That is, at the very least, men use women as
useful objects and instruments for penetration,
and women are dehumanised by this act. It is
an act of violence.
As FCM pointed out some time ago,
intercourse is inherently harmful to women
and intentionally so, because it causes
pregnancy in women. The purpose of men
enforcing intercourse regularly (as in, more
than once a month) onto women is because
it’s the surest way to cause pregnancy and
force childbearing against our will, and
thereby gain control over our reproductive
powers. There is no way to eliminate the
pregnancy risk entirely off PIV and the
mitigating and harm-reduction practices such
as contraception and abortion are inherently
harmful, too. Reproductive harms of PIV range
from pregnancy to abortion, having to take
invasive, or toxic contraception, giving birth,
forced child bearing and rearing and all the
complications that go with them which may
lead up to severe physical and emotional
damage, disability, destitution, illness, or
death (See factcheckme.wordpress.com for her
work on the reproductive harms of PIV, click
on the “intercourse series” page or “PIV” in the
search bar). If we compare this to even the
crappiest online definition of violence:
“behaviour involving physical force intended to
hurt, damage, or kill someone or something”.
Bingo. It fits: Pregnancy = may hurt, damage
or kill. Intercourse = a man using his physical
force to penetrate a woman. Intention /
purpose of the act of intercourse = to cause
pregnancy. PIV is therefore intentional harm /
violence. Intentional sexual harm of a man
against a woman through penile penetration =
RAPE.
If we look at the act in more detail (skip this
parag if you can’t take it), PIV is a man
mounting on a woman to thrust a large
member of himself into her most intimate
parts, often forcing her to be entirely naked,
banging himself against her with the whole
weight of his body and hips, shaking her like
he would stuff a corpse, then using her insides
as a receptacle for his penile dejection. How is
this a normal civilised, respectful way to treat
anyone? Sorry for the explicit picture, but this
is what it is and it’s absolutely revolting and
violating.""""
Link.
PIV= Penis in vagina, btw

Very interesting

And WHO came up with that definition? I'm kinda at a loss for words

Meh...some whackjob radical feminist....you cant rape the willing

What utter and total bullsh!t.

@WalkSoftly: Wow..............................................

the fu.ck? I mean for real. This sh!t is stupid... and NOT even logical... smdh.

Lol!

I'm willing to bet that that woman who wrote that looks like a gorilla and has never actually had a PIV lol

and im pretty sure that rad fem is just a polite word for man hating lesbian aswell :p

Thats ****ed up... chick sounds like she needs some good **** or to remove the stick up her ass haha